Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 10:31

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
PoGO This Week (June 2-8): G-Max Rillaboom, Groudon Raids & GO Fest JC - Pokémon GO Hub
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Oral Bacteria Diversity Linked to Depression Symptoms - Neuroscience News
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What is the message of Ex Machina?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
WhatsApp backs Apple in its legal row with the UK over user data - BBC
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
iOS 19: All the rumored changes Apple could be bringing to its new operating system - TechCrunch
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
How can you tell if someone is cunning?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?